My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad

Photography

  • Bling Blingo!
    Blingo
  • Spritopias: Smarter. Brighter. Better.
  • Alev Vance
  • Suburban Island

Become a Fan

« if I knew (how to save a life) | Main | Grand Slam »

Saturday, 07 February 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341f760e53ef01116850b59b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference keep away from it :

Comments

iidlyyckma

Why do you think we judge so much?

Spritopias

I don't know why we judge so much, but anyone who professes not to is a liar and if anyone believes them it is only themselves.

golfwidow

I think we judge because our instincts tell us to do so: we must decide whether this other human is suitable to mate with, to hunt with, or whether or not we can protect ourselves against him or her.

Or we're just rat bastards. It doesn't matter too much to me.

Trev

Is the question, "why do we judge?", "why do we judge without enough information to pass a fair judgment?", OR "Why do we CHOOSE to judge without enough information to pass a fair judgement?"

Answering these questions from first to last, we evolve from limbic to neocortex thinking, or some might say, from raw truth to calculated deception.

1. We judge in general to gauge threats - a natural and involuntary survival response. We can't help but to do so. It's absolutely involuntary, hardwired, and absolute. (as are all things controlled by the limbic system.) We make hundreds of thousands of these subconscious evaluations every day - some only take fractions of a second to make.

2. We judge without enough information, because our brains have to fill in gaps between pieces of information that complete a scenario when information is left out in order to create a whole picture, and then move on to the next thing - if we stopped to assertively observe every thing going on around us with our conscious mind, we'd crash our hard drives - your subconcious takes in all the details and shoots the relevant info up to the surface IF it feels inclined to do so. This is kind of a cross between limbic and neocortex driven behavior. The need to filter out unnecessary details is essential to our sanity. The guess-work involved in building logical bridges between gaps in a scenario with only the information provided, (Which is often not enough to support your conclusion if you examine it objectively) is performed by the neocortex, and because it is, it's subject to bias, and emotion - which skews the fuck out of everything.

The answer to the third question is that we instinctively loathe inconsistency because inconsistancy equals unpredictability, and that, in turn, equals possible danger. So we may choose to judge in contrast to the implications of new information, to perpetuate the consistency of previously held opinions because changing your psychology is taking a risk, and taking risks equals exposing yourself to danger, either emotionally, physically or both.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment